Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. . Morton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Upon the application of either party or of its own motion, the court may direct a reference . • . . “where the issues of fact and questions of fact arise in an action of which the courts of equity of the State had exclusive jurisdiction prior to the adoption of the Constitution of one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, and in which the matter or amount in dispute is not less than the sum or value of five hundred dollars.” C. S., 513 (5). In this case the court, of its own motion, ordered a reference under this section and appointed a referee. The defendant excepted on the ground that he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. . SilverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Shelton v. . SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  3. Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Riggs v. . SwannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
  5. Alley v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Industrial Lithographic Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Wolfe v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API