Legal Opinion

Perry v. Doub

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1959No. 460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmáN, J.

The chronological history of this litigation clearly indicates the desirability of bringing it to a conclusion as early as that is practicable without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties.

Plaintiffs’ first assignment of error challenges the right of the court to order a compulsory reference.

The trial judge is by statute, G.S. 1-189, authorized to order a compulsory reference where the examination of a long account is necessary to settle the controversy. Our statutes authorizing trial by referees are liberally construed to facilitate the work of the court and to simplify the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Kerr v. Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Marshville Cotton Mills, Inc. v. MaslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Long v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Crew v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API