Legal Opinion

Leach v. Quinn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.

Having objected and excepted to the order of compulsory reference entered below, the defendants had the option to appeal at once or to wait final judgment to do so, to present the exception to the order duly preserved. Lumber Co. v. Pemberton, 188 N. C., 532, 125 S. E., 119. They have elected to pursue the former course. Hence, we now have presented in this Court the sole question as to whether there was error in making an order of compulsory reference without first determining the pleas in bar made in the answer to the allegations contained in the complaint. We are constrained to hold that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Green Sea Lumber Co. v. PembertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Industrial Lithographic Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Grimes v. County of BeaufortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Haywood County v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API