Preister v. Stanly Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
It is an elementary rule of procedure, upheld by many decisions of this Court, that when the answer sets up a plea in complete bar of plaintiff’s action, a compulsory reference should not be ordered until the plea, which may defeat the action entirely and render an accounting useless, has been determined. McIntosh Prac. & Proc., sec. 523; Smith v. Goldsboro, 121 N. C., 350; R. R. v. Morrison, 82 N. C., 141.
What constitutes a plea in bar has been considered and accurately defined by this Court in Bank v. Evans, 191 N. C., 538, as follows: “In a legal sense it is a plea or peremptory exception…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Smith v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Commissioners of Iredell County v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State Ex Rel. Haywood County v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Industrial Lithographic Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Cheshire v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Leach v. QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Leach v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943