Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Harpole
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff alleges in his petition that on May 4, 1922, at 12 p. m. (midnight) he drove his automobile from west to south along a public highway, just south of Ardmore, Okla., and at a point where the defendant’s railway running north and south crosses the highway; that there is an incline in the highway up to the railway tracks and approaching the tracks he “looked and listened,” but not seeing or hearing a. train approaching, he drove his automobile upon the defendant’s tracks, and in attempting to “shift…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BaroniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Shawnee v. RoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Mathers v. YoungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. NailSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Sooner Foods, Incorporated v. EgglestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.