Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Harman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 10, 1931No. 19774PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
This action was originally commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by Lois Lee Harman against the city of Tulsa to recover damages because of the death of her husband, William Gil bert Harman, alleged to have been caused by and through the negligence of the defend'-, ant. The trial was to a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of defendant. Hereafter the defendant in error will be referred to as plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error as defendant, this being their position in the trial court.
On motion of plaintiff the trial court set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. At the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- District of Columbia v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Holland v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Wheat v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Beatty v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Henryetta Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Thomas v. Holliday by and Through HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Lakeview, Inc. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.