Legal Opinion
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Duran
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 22, 1913No. 2645PublishedCited by 62 opinions
Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Roy Hoffman, Judge. Action by L. Duran against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The defendant- in error, as plaintiff, sued the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for damages on account of an inquiry alleged to have resulted from said defendant’s negligence, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff ias ¡against ¡the defendant for $1,500. The parties will be herein -referred to in the style in which they appeared in the lower court.
The allegations of the petition are in' part as follows:
“Count 1: * * * This plaintiff was engaged in the service of the defendant at or near * * * working as -a section hand, .and engaged with others in repairing defendant’s said…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Coalgate Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.