Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Baroni
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge. Action by Augustus Baroni, by his next friend, Catón Baroni, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company to recover damages on account of personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AMES, C.
The error discussed in the brief of the plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, is that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for new trial, and under this assignment it is argued that the court erred in refusing an instruction requested by the defendant; in giving an instruction contained in the charge; that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; that it was error to permit a majority verdict to be returned; and that the court erred in refusing to hear argument of counsel on the motion for new trial.
The plaintiff, a nine year old boy,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- First Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. TevisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Linson v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- International Bank of Coalgate v. Mullen MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hines v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.