St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Long
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Marshall County; James R. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Mabel V. Long against the St. Louis & San Erancisco Railroad Company, a corporation.. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
In this opinion plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
On March 15, 1909, S. H. Long, foreman of defendant’s switch engine crew, was killed in uncoupling its moving cars in its yards at Francis, Okla.; and on June 10, 1909, plaintiff, for herself and minor child, Hazel Long, these being wife and child respectively of said S. H. Long, commenced this action against . defendant for $35,000 as alleged damages suffered by reason of alleged negligence of defendant, as…
2Cases cited116 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Burke v. . WitherbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Dickinson v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Osage Coal & Mining Co. v. SperraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.