Legal Opinion

Mathers v. Younger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1936No. 26435PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Josie OB. Mathers, the plaintiff in error, brought suit against Lulu B. Younger, administratrix of the estate of George R. Beyers, deceased, to recover damages for personal injuries. The case was called for trial and testimony introduced by the plaintiff. The defendant in error interposed a demurrer to the evidence, which was sustained and the cause dismissed. A motion for a new trial was filed by the plaintiff, which was overruled, exception taken, and an appeal perfected to this court.

The parties will be designated as they appeared in the court below, jfiaintiff and defendant.

The petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Weinreich Estate Co. v. A. J. Johnston Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Toombs v. CummingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Lusk v. PughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Porter v. Norton-Stuart Pontiac-Cadillac of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Key v. Liquid Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Beesley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. E. S. Billington Lumber Co. v. CheathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. KennardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API