Edens v. City of Columbia
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
The Housing Authority of the City of Columbia has proceeded under the “Redevelopment Law”, section 36-401 et seq. of the Code of 1952, and determined that an area of the city is a “blighted” area, which is principally occupied by slum dwellings; and they propose to take the property, by condemnation if necessary, clear it of the present structures and sell it at the then fair value, a portion of it to the University of South Carolina for the expansion of it, and the remainder, which is the most of it, to private persons and corporations for sites for light industry, with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Matter of Murray v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Adams v. Housing Authority of City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.