Legal Opinion
Tousley v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 26, 1926No. 25,083PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action by taxpayers of Hennepin county to compel the board of county commissioners, and the surety on their official bonds, to pay into the county treasury money which under authority of the board was paid for the services of engineers in the construction of the approaches to the Mendota bridge over the Minnesota river at Fort Snelling. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the plaintiffs appeal.
In Malmberg v. County of Hennepin, 156 Minn. 389, 194 N. W. 765, we held that the statute, L. 1921, p. 428, c. 323, § 29, now embodied in G. S. 1923, § 2569, providing for the appointment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- City of Marshall v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Armstrong v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Malmberg v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wakely v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Lindgren v. Towns of Algoma and NorlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Nelson v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Lindgren v. Towns of Algoma and NorlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.