Legal Opinion

Kotschevar v. Township of North Fork

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1949No. 34,856PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Plaintiff is a road builder. He was employed by defendant township of North Fork, Stearns county, to construct a five-mile stretch of road. An additional two and one-half miles were added later. The road was constructed by plaintiff and accepted by the town board. The board, because of the objections here presented for decision, was unable to pay the bill in full. Plaintiff brought action and recovered a verdict, reduced by the court to $3,886.39. Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

In June 1945, the town board sent for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Village of Pillager v. HewettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rettman v. City of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1986
  3. Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Roberts v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. v. Maple Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API