Armstrong v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis count)' to recover $567 for services rendered. From an order, Dibell, J., sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the counterclaim. set up in its answer, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the district court of the county of St. Louis sustaining the demurrer of the plaintiff to the counterclaim set up in its answer. The complaint alleged a cause of action against the defendant upon an implied contract for services, in that the plaintiff, at defendant’s request, performed services for it in stabling and caring for its horses from May 1, 1901, to March 16, 1904, which services were of the reasonable value of $567. The allegations of the counterclaim are to the effect that the defendant from time to time between May, 1901, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schmidt v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Bayne v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Megaarden v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arnold v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Tousley v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Malmberg v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923