Legal Opinion

Bell v. Kirkland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1907No. Nos. 15,266, 15,267—(147, 148)PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $2,967.55 against the principal and sureties upon the bond described in the opinion. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants Ulmer, Warner, and Wagener severally appealed.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $2,967.55 against the principal and sureties upon the bond described in the opinion. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants Ulmer, Warner, and Wagener severally appealed. The recital in the bond was in the following words: ' “Whereas, the above bounden Edward J. Kirkland has entered into a contract with the city of St. Paul to construct a sewer on Somerville avenue from the Mississippi river to Eustis street; thence…

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

Plaintiff and respondent brought an action against defendants'and appellants to recover the unpaid balance for materials furnished to one Kirkland to be used in the construction of the “Somerville sewer.” Kirkland contracted to construct the sewer, and, as principal, signed an instrument in which the appellants joined as sureties, which purported to be a bond to the city of St. Paul conditioned for the performance of the contract, and for the payment for the labor and materials furnished in its execution. The total amount of the account was $6,286.30. The balance unpaid was $2,967.55. The…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Bissell v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API