Legal Opinion
Lindgren v. Towns of Algoma and Norland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 19, 1932No. 28,933PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
The town of Algoma appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against it in the sum of $117.10.
Plaintiff and 11 other persons performed certain work in constructing and repairing a mile of a town line road between the town of Algoma and the town of Norland. The town of Norland paid its one-half of the cost thereof. The 11 other persons properly assigned their claims to plaintiff, who remained the owner thereof. Complying with the statute, the claims were filed Avith the toAvn clerk *32of Algoma. They were disallowed. The town of Algoma defended in an action brought in justice court;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Romsdahl v. Town of Long LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lindgren v. Towns of Algoma and NorlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932