Legal Opinion

Wakely v. County of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1931No. 28,404PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 240 N.W. 103. Plaintiff furnished from his land clay and sand for surfacing and repairing one of defendant county's roads. He filed a bill therefor with the county board, which disallowed it. Plaintiff appealed to the district court, and after trial plaintiff was granted recovery in the sum of $153.07 with interest and costs. Defendant moved in the alternative for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law in its favor or for a new trial. The court granted some slight amendments of the findings of fact and made one additional finding, but refused to make any change in its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Lundin v. Township of Butternut ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Frisch v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Karon v. KelloggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Edwards v. MettlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Lindgren v. Towns of Algoma and NorlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API