Wakely v. County of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 240 N.W. 103. Plaintiff furnished from his land clay and sand for surfacing and repairing one of defendant county's roads. He filed a bill therefor with the county board, which disallowed it. Plaintiff appealed to the district court, and after trial plaintiff was granted recovery in the sum of $153.07 with interest and costs. Defendant moved in the alternative for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law in its favor or for a new trial. The court granted some slight amendments of the findings of fact and made one additional finding, but refused to make any change in its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Lundin v. Township of Butternut ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Frisch v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Karon v. KelloggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Edwards v. MettlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Lindgren v. Towns of Algoma and NorlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.