Legal Opinion

Nelson v. City of Eveleth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1936No. 30,719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of defendant. The action was tried to the court, who filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. There was no motion for a new trial, xlmended findings were requested and denied. There are no assignments of error. And from the plaintiff’s brief we understand the findings of fact are not questioned or attacked as unsupported; but the claim is that the conclusion of law directing judgment of dismissal with costs against plaintiff is erroneous.

Defendant is a city of the fourth class operating under a home rule charter.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. City of Louisville v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Bishop v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Pratts v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Levant v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API