Legal Opinion
Intercontinental Marble Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 30, 2003No. Consol. 98-02961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and OrdeR
EATON, Judge.
Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56. By its motion Plaintiff challenges the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) 1 classification of certain entries of merchandise as “other calcareous stone” under subheading 6802.92.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1998). Plaintiff argues that the subject merchandise is properly classifiable under HTSUS subheading 6802.91.05 as “Worked monumental or building stone ... Other: Marble, traver-tine and alabaster: Marble:…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Intercontinental Marble Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- LeMANS CORP. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Specialty Commodities Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Vanetta U.S.A. Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.