Legal Opinion

Vanetta U.S.A. Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 29, 2004No. 97-00117Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 04 - 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x VANETTA U.S.A. INCORPORATED, : Plaintiff, : Consolidated v. : Court No. 97-01-00117 UNITED STATES, : Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x Opinion [Upon classification of animal-feed additives, judgment for the plaintiff.] Decided: January 29, 2004 Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (James S. O'Kelly, Alan Goggins and Kevin J. Sullivan) for the plaintiff. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; Barbara S. Williams, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API