Legal Opinion

Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 27, 2003No. Slip Op. 03-142; Court 00-00325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiff, BAUER NIKE Hockey USA Inc., f/k/a Bauer USA, Inc. (“Bauer Nike” or “Plaintiff’) challenges a decision of the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “Defendant”) 1 denying Plaintiffs protests filed in accordance with section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (2000). At issue is the proper tariff classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), 19 U.S.C. § 1202 (1994), of Plaintiffs imports of ice hockey pants.

Bauer Nike claims that the subject merchandise is classifiable…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Bauer Nike Hockey Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. LeMANS CORP. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  4. Bauer Nike Hockey USA v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Conair Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API