Legal Opinion

Starr v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1995No. 94-84PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Christine Starr appeals from her conviction for grand larceny.

We affirm.

Issues

Appellant sets forth her issues on appeal in the form of declaratory statements as follows:

ISSUE I: The trial court committed reversible error by admitting into the evidence a marked $50.00 bill that the police seized without a warrant, without probable cause, and without exigent circumstances in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article 1, § 4 of the Wyoming Constitution.

ISSUE II: Appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ortega v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API