Legal Opinion

Dickeson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-105PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether Elizabeth Dickeson (Dickeson) was denied the effective assistance of counsel at her trial. This issue was not raised in the trial court and, of course, there is no ruling by the trial court on this claim. Other issues are identified and argued relating to the suppression of statements made by Dickeson following the seizure of her diary; the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction; and the deprivation of a fair trial because of a plethora of evidentiary errors. We conclude that the record in this case demonstrates that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Helton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API