Legal Opinion

Frias v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1986No. 85-66PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Martin Frias was convicted, after trial to a jury, of second-degree murder in the shooting death of his girl friend, Ernestine Perea.

We reverse.

Appellant raises the following issues:

“1. Whether the failure of a juror to answer voir dire questions truthfully deprived appellant of his constitutional right to an impartial jury and his statutory right to peremptory challenges.
“2. Whether the trial court erred in ruling that the physician-patient privilege does not exist in criminal cases.
“3. Whether appellant’s conviction was obtained in violation of his constitutional…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API