Legal Opinion

Central Manufacturing District, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1960No. Civ. 23953PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from judgment in mandamus which annuls a proceeding for incorporation of an area to be known as city of Mirada Hills because it was initiated six months after the voters rejected incorporation of city of La Mirada Knolls, held to be in violation of section 34325.1 of the Government Code: “If a majority of the votes cast is against incorporation, no further proceedings for the incorporation of the same or substantially the same area shall be initiated for two years after the date of the election.” (Emphasis added.) The trial court held that the proposed Mirada Hills included…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mott v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Olivas v. WeinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. City of Campbell v. MoskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API