Legal Opinion

Olivas v. Weiner

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1954No. Civ. 20230PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an action for damages for malpractice growing out of defendant’s attendance upon plaintiff’s birth on December 1, 1931. Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 23, 1953. Defendant’s demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.

This case turns upon thé interpretation and application of section 29 of the Civil Code. * Plaintiff contends that the six-year limitation specified in the amendment, within which to bring such an action, does not apply to him since it was added some 10 years after he was born, at which time the alleged…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Scott v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Young v. HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Owens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Greenhalgh v. Payson CityUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Strauch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API