Sears v. Rule
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Charles F. Weber died in 1934, leaving all his property to his wife, Sarah E. Weber. Mrs. Weber died in January, 1936. Plaintiffs and cross-defendants (hereinafter called plaintiffs) are the remaining heirs of Charles Weber. They brought this action to impress a trust upon property distributed from the estate of Mrs. Weber to defendant Charles T. Rule, her brother, as sole beneficiary under her will. The complaint alleged that the decree of distribution in the estate of Mrs. Weber had been procured through the extrinsic fraud of Charles Rule, that in fact the decedent died intestate, and that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Kimball v. Pacific Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.