Legal Opinion
Mott v. Horstmann
California Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1950No. S. F. 18170PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the Auditor of the city of Oaldand to approve certain salary payments.
The petitioner is a landscape architect specializing in designing and laying out parks and playgrounds for cities and counties. On August 28, 1946, he was appointed Superintendent of Parks of the city of Oakland at a salary of $600 per month. On December 2, 1947, while still holding that position, he accepted an appointment as a member of the Planning Commission of Contra Costa County. Beginning in January, 1948, the city auditor of the city of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel Commission of the Pajaro Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.