Crowe v. Boyle
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is an action brought by taxpayers to enjoin the defendant auditor from paying two hundred and seventy-six thousand dollars, due under a contract between the city and county of San Francisco, which will hereafter be referred to as “the city,” and the Construction Company of North America, for the construction of about sixteen miles of aqueduct on what is known as the mountain division of the Hetch Hetchy project. The plaintiffs allege that the contract is void. The trial court, upon stipulated facts, denied the injunction and plaintiffs appeal. It is conceded by appellants that the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.