Legal Opinion

Celestron Pacific v. Criterion Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 2, 1982No. Civ. A. 15872, N-74-276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 3,837,124 AND OF UNITED STATES LETTERS PATENT NO. REISSUE 28,878

ZAMPANO, District Judge.

I

On October 3, 1973, the plaintiff, Celes-tron Pacific (“Celestron”), commenced Civil Action No. 15,872 against the defendants Criterion Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“Criterion”), and Robert Goff, a former employee of Celestron, who was employed by Criterion. In its complaint, Celestron basically contended that confidential and trade secrets relating to the manufacture and sale of Schmidt corrector plates and mirrors, used…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Anthony J. Cali v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Jamesbury Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perseptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  2. United States Surgical Corp. v. Hospital Products International Pty. Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  3. McMurray v. HarwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
  4. Tucker v. Oregon Aero, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2007
  5. Rawlplug Co., Inc. v. Hilti AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API