Rawlplug Co., Inc. v. Hilti Aktiengesellschaft
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, Senior District Judge.
Before this Court are (1) defendants’ motions to dismiss and (2) plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motion is denied and defendants’ motions are granted. 1
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, the Rawlplug Company, Inc. (“Rawlplug”), is a New York corporation engaged in the manufacture and worldwide sale of fastener devices. 2 Defendant Hilti Aktiengesellschaft (“HAG”) is a Liechtenstein corporation, also engaged in the manufacture and sale of fastener devices. Defendant Hilti, Inc. (“HUS”) is a New York…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Rival Manufacturing Company v. Dazey Products CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- Edwin G. Bemis v. Chevron Research Company, Standard Oil Company of California, and Stanley O. HutchisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMurray v. HarwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Heden v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996