Legal Opinion
Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 7, 1973No. 71-CV-114PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES T. FOLEY, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
Defendant has made two motions, one requesting summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.Pro. or alternatively that I make findings of fact under Rule 56(d); the other motion seeks an order to prevent plaintiff from using some fruits of discovery in foreign litigation.
I
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendant’s assertion that there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding the invalidity of the patent is based upon two contentions: (1) Its wording of claims is indefinite in that the patent described therein with definiteness only as to what is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.