Legal Opinion
Perseptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 28, 1998No. CIV. A. 93-12237-PBSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc. and Purdue Research Foundation (collectively “PerSeptive”) have filed motions (1) to vacate the March 31, 1997 order on correction of patents; (2) to enter a judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); and (3) to withdraw the motion to correct inventorship. This flurry of motions was precipitated by a new standard articulated in a recent decision, Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., 119 F.3d 1551, 43 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 (Fed.Cir. July 11, 1997) (“Stark ”), which fundamentally alters the legal landscape of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Nichols Institute Diagnostics, Inc. v. Scantibodies Clinical Laboratory, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2002
- Brasseler U.S.A., I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
- University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Föerderung Der Wissenschaften e.V.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.