Legal Opinion
McMurray v. Harwood
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 14, 1994No. 93-C-836PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, District Judge.
This lawsuit concerns plaintiff Robert McMurray’s (“plaintiff’) allegation that his former employer John Harwood (“Harwood”) procured a patent for a toe-cap and wrongly identified himself (Harwood) as the sole inventor. The complaint asserts that this is a “case arising under the patent laws of the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 & 1338(a).” (Complaint at 2). More specifically, plaintiffs sole federal claim is based on 35 U.S.C. § 256. The remaining pendant state law causes of action include: a claim under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Claim…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal CraftersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- David B. Deutsch v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In Re Oil Spill by Amoco CadizDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Dr. David D. Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., and Jerome Goldstein, Ernest v. Groman and Lee JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American CyanamidDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- K-Tek Corp. v. LovettDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Heden v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.