Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Oregon Aero, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 1, 2007No. CV-05-930-HUPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Michael W. Tucker brings this action against defendants Oregon Aero, Inc., MJD Innovations, LLC, Michael Den nis, 1-OPINION & ORDER and Jude Dennis. Plaintiff and defendants move for summary judgment. All parties have also consented to entry of final judgment by a Magistrate Judge in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
For the reasons explained below, I deny defendants’ motion and I grant in part and deny in part plaintiffs motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a mechanical engineer with work '…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beckley v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- Alan Beckley and Virginia Johnston Beckley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- Beckley v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
- C.R. Bard Incorporated v. Atrium Medical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022