Legal Opinion

Middleton v. California Street Cable Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1946No. Civ. 12977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Defendants appeal from an order granting a new trial after a jury had rendered a verdict in their favor in two actions, consolidated for trial and appeal, involving personal injuries to plaintiffs, a mother and daughter, who were injured while they were passengers for hire on defendant California Street Cable Railway Company’s system. The other defendants, Hall and Hill, are respectively the grip-man or operator of the cable car and the conductor.

The plaintiffs were mother and an adult daughter, who were riding home from church about noon one Sunday. The plaintiffs produced evidence to show…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Sassano v. RoullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Steele v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wyatt v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Scott v. RenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wilkinson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Finley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Los Angeles City High School District v. KitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Tait v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API