Legal Opinion

Tait v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1956No. Civ. 16829PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a personal injury action by a passenger on one of defendant’s trolley cars who allegedly was injured when the car was stopped with a violent jerk. The verdict was for defendant, a motion for a new trial was denied and plaintiff appeals on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and errors of law, mainly as to instructions. We have concluded that the judgment on the verdict must be affirmed.

Plaintiff and two lady friends of hers, Mrs. Parliman and Miss Burns were in the evening rush hour of May 26, 1953, traveling on a line 41 trolley car from…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Spolter v. Four-Wheel Brake Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Sunshield Insulation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Agustin v. Golden Empire Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Strouse v. Webcor ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API