Legal Opinion

Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1938No. S. F. 15995PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

We adopt the following statement of facts and conclusions of law from the opinion of the District Court of Appeal rendered in this action when it was before said court.

“From a judgment awarding the plaintiff damages in the sum of $42,500, the defendants have appealed and have brought up a typewritten record.
“On September 18, 1934, the plaintiff, then thirteen years of age, was injured in an accident between Eighteenth and Nineteenth Streets on Castro. In the accident a street car operated by Market Street Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as railway, ran over the feet of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API