Legal Opinion
Scott v. Renz
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1945No. Civ. 12742PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs to recover damages for the death of their infant child, aged three years and eight months, it being alleged that the death was caused by the negligence of defendants. After a jury verdict for defendants, the plaintiffs moved for a new trial on all of the statutory grounds. The motion was granted without specifying insufficiency of the evidence. It must be assumed, therefore, that the motion was not granted on that ground. (Code Civ. Proc., § 657.) From the order granting the motion defendants appeal.
Appellants vigorously urge that, where a trial court has…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Conroy v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. MixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.