Legal Opinion
Los Angeles City High School District v. Kita
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1959No. Civ. 23377PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Proceeding in eminent domain. A jury found the market value of the property sought to he condemned. Judgment of condemnation followed. On motion of plaintiff a new trial was granted. The order reads:
“Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial as to Parcels 1 and 2, heretofore submitted, is now by the court granted on the ground of error in law, occurring at the trial and excepted to by the plaintiff, and particularly error in permitting enquiry on cross-examination of an expert witness for plaintiff as to an offer to purchase certain property as embodied in Defendants’ Exhibit L.’’
Defendants…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- County of Contra Costa v. East Bay Municipal DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. KawamotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.