Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1909No. L.A. No. 2273PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. M. C. Hester and Hester, Merrill & Craig, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action by the heirs at law of Catherine Gray, deceased, to recover damages for her death, which, it is alleged, was caused by the negligence of the defendant. The verdict was in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The defendant was operating a line of street-railroad cars in the city of Pasadena. The complaint alleges that the deceased was a passenger on defendant’s car; that the car stopped and she was in the act of stepping from the rear of the car to the street, when it was started backwards by the employees of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kahn v. Triest-Rosenberg Cap Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Patterson v. San Francisco & San Mateo Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lincoln Traction Co. v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Capps v. American Airlines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API