Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hedrick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1986No. OSB 84-104; SC S32443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Howard R. Hedrick, one of its members, accusing him of unethical conduct in two separate causes.

The First Cause of Complaint alleged a violation of:

“DR 9-102 Preserving the Identity of Funds and Property of a Client.
“(B) A lawyer shall:

‡ ‡

“(3) Maintain complete records of all funds, securities and other properties of a client coming into the possession of the lawyer and render appropriate accounts to his client regarding them.
“(4) Promptly pay or deliver to the client as requested by a client the funds, securities, or other properties in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VaileOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API