Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Haws

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1990No. 86-58, 86-121, 86-125, 86-127, 86-142, 87-9, 87-13 and 87-20; SC S33640Published

1Opinion of the Court

801 P.2d 818 (1990)

310 Or. 741

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Eric HAWS, Accused.

Nos. 86-58; 86-121; 86-125; 86-127; 86-142; 87-9; 87-13; and 87-20; SC S33640.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 7, 1989.

Decided November 26, 1990.

John C. Fisher, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused. With him on the reply brief was David Dickens, Eugene.

Jeffrey D. Sapiro, Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, filed the brief and argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LINDE[*], CARSON, JONES[**], GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN and FADELEY, JJ.

2Per curiam

In…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RookOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API