In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an attorney discipline proceeding. The accused and the Oregon State Bar submitted to the trial panel a “Joint Stipulation of Facts and Recommendation” 1 in which the accused admitted violations of Disciplinary Rule 2-106(A) and former Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) and 9-102(A) 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Both the accused and the Bar recommended that the accused be suspended from the practice of law for two years; that, before reinstatement, the accused be required to pass a professional responsibility examination; and that he be placed on probation for the first two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.