Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. v. Islip Resource Recovery Agency

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 12, 1989No. CV 88-2733PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

The present construction-contract action arises out of an agreement awarding Pennsylvania Energy Resources Company, Ltd. (“PERC”) the right to construct and operate a solid waste disposal facility in Islip, New York. In their complaint plaintiffs assert four causes of action. In response, defendants allege nine counterclaims against plaintiffs and Victor Posner, a counterclaim defendant. Jurisdiction is retained through diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendants move for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ case in its entirety and on their…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lytle v. CitiFinancial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  3. International Cabletel Inc. v. Le Groupe Videotron LteeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Action Air Freight, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. TM Marketing, Inc. v. Art & Antiques Associates, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API