Legal Opinion

Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 25, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-3712 (AJL)PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction.1166

Facts.1167

A. The Parties and Other Significant Persons.1167

B. Apollo’s Fuel Additives and Pollution Control Technology.1168

C. The Bid for the NAPOCOR Trial Contract.1169

1. Apollo’s Version of Events.1169

2. Centrosphere’s Version of Events.1171

D. The Agency Contracts.1171

1. The First Agency Contract. 1172

2. The Second Agency Contract.1172

E. Performance of the Trial Contract.1174

F. Completion of the Trial Contract.1175

G. Relationship Between Apollo and Centrosphere After 1 January 1992— 1176

H. Recent Dealings Between Apollo and NAPOCOR.1178

I.. Recent Actions By…

International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Jews for Jesus v. BrodskyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
Insurance Co. of North America v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
One World Botanicals Ltd. v. Gulf Coast Nutritionals, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.