Legal Opinion
TM Marketing, Inc. v. Art & Antiques Associates, L.P.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 14, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-1889 (AJL)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge., Currently before the court is the motion of plaintiff TM Marketing, Inc. (“TM Marketing”) to confirm an arbitration award (the “Award”) in favor of TM Marketing, and to direct that judgment be entered requiring defendant Art & Antiques Associates, L.P. (“A & A Associates”) to pay all amounts due under the Award and to pay attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by TM Marketing in bringing this motion. 1
Jurisdiction is alleged pursuant to Section 9 of the United States Arbitration Act (the “Arbitration Act”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. For the reasons that follow, this…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Aubie BALTIN; Gwilda Baltin, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. ALARON TRADING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- In Re Manuel Kaplan, Debtor. Manuel Kaplan Arthur Liebersohn, Trustee v. First Options of Chicago, Inc. Manuel KaplanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Cohen v. KurtzmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Lake v. First Nationwide BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.