Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1959No. L. A. 25406PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On May 22, 1956, Oliver 0. Clark, an attorney at law, was charged by information with eight counts of grand theft and five counts of selling securities of the United States Onyx Corporation (hereafter referred to as “Onyx Corporation”) without first obtaining a permit from the California Commissioner of Corporations. The jury found defendant guilty on all 13 counts. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was granted. Before the retrial, Clark changed his plea and pleaded guilty to two charges of violating section 26104, subdivision (a) of the Corporations Code by knowingly selling stock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. RatliffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Muniz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Otash v. Bureau of Private InvestigatorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Ring v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API