Legal Opinion

People v. Ratliff

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1933No. Docket No. 237PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

The appellant S. A. Ratliff was charged in an amended indictment returned by, the grand jury of San Diego County with the crime of violation of the Corporate Securities Act of the state of California and was convicted of the charge contained in count II of the indictment, which is as follows:

“2. The said S. A. Ratliff and W. B. Bird, on or about the 2nd day of April, 1929, in the County of San Diego, State of California, and before the finding of this indictment, did wilfully, unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously and for the purpose and with the intent then and there to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. YantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. RubensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API