Legal Opinion

In Re Hatch

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1937No. Bar Misc. 1481PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On February 10, 1937, Ira S. Hatch, an attorney at law, was found guilty by the court sitting without a jury on 52 counts in two informations charging violations of the Corporate Securities Act in that he knowingly participated in the issuance and sale of securities without first having obtained a permit from the commissioner of corporations ; also that he engaged in the purchase of securities for the purpose of reselling them without first having obtained a broker’s license from the commissioner of corporations. The record of his convictions was filed with this court pursuant to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Daugherty v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API